Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28-02-2006, 10:17 PM   #1
Falcon Freak
Banned
 
Falcon Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,516
Default It apears that VE will be significantly heavier than VZ

Link to article

For those of us who have seen the prototypes the weight gain sounds correct as the VE is a larger car. Add to that all the extra equipment and new crash requirements and it makes for one heavy vehicle.

FF

Falcon Freak is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-02-2006, 10:24 PM   #2
Redrum
Force Fed Fords
 
Redrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Victoria
Posts: 5,556
Default

Will be interesting to see the outcome. I have heard many good things about Orion!!!
__________________
2021 Focus ST-3 Mountune Enhanced
Redrum is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-02-2006, 10:45 PM   #3
Lukeyson
Right out sideways
 
Lukeyson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Coffs Harbour NSW
Posts: 5,304
Default

the v6 is a dog with the current weight, slap another 150kg+ on it, will feel like it has less torque than it does now.

but i am looking forward to the VE, healthy competition is always a good thing !
__________________
2010 FG XR50 Turbo | 2007 FPV BFII GT, BOSS 302
Lukeyson is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-02-2006, 10:48 PM   #4
Dave_au
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northern Sydney
Posts: 1,908
Default

Sounds like its going to be about the weight of the BA/BF falcon.
Dave_au is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-02-2006, 10:52 PM   #5
MrSparkle
An Old Boss™©
Contributing Member
 
MrSparkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,145
Default

Good lord! There's a news flash! Geez, I think I predicted this back on the old forums, when BA details were first leaked. My prediction was confirmed by a contact a month or two after that, but it's a little late now for me to tell all who doubted me, "I told you so!".

Nah screw it ... I TOLD YOU SO!
__________________
Where did I go? What was I doing there?™©
MrSparkle is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-02-2006, 10:53 PM   #6
gtfpv
GT
 
gtfpv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 9,205
Default

well it will be good weight is good if it is benificial .great to see holden chasing ford in some way .
gtfpv is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-02-2006, 11:07 PM   #7
Kenster
 
Kenster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SE suburbs, Melbourne
Posts: 939
Default

im sure Ford got something in mind to completit with the new commodore
Kenster is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-02-2006, 11:30 PM   #8
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

If Ford can make the Orion lighter than the BF then it will Holden a good kick in the nuts. The weight and fuel economy benefits would move Fords way.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-03-2006, 12:51 AM   #9
JPFS1
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
JPFS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,504
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossxr8
If Ford can make the Orion lighter than the BF then it will Holden a good kick in the nuts. The weight and fuel economy benefits would move Fords way.
Not looking good unfortunately.
JPFS1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-03-2006, 01:03 AM   #10
EFFalcon
Last warning
 
EFFalcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Victoria HeadCount: 3
Posts: 11,194
Default

who cares, BA weigh a tonne (or 1.8 to be exact :P) and in stock form they still kill the older lighter cars.
__________________
FALCN6 - Turbo, Air Bag Suspension - Hibernating
EL GT - Supercharged
NASCAR - 83 Thunderbird , Bagged
DAILY - BA Fairlane Ghia, Boss 260 Turbo
OFFROADER - Ford Explorer
EFFalcon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-03-2006, 01:11 AM   #11
Steffo
LPG > You
 
Steffo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
Default

Hmm. This is interesting.

BF FPV F6 Typhoon...

270kW 550Nm, 1775kg manual, 1805kg automatic

152.11kW/tonne and 309.85Nm/tonne manual
149.58kW/tonne and 304.70Nm/tonne automatic

VZ HSV Clubsport...

297kW 530Nm, 1696kg manual, 1702kg automatic

175.11kW/tonne and 312.5Nm/tonne manual
174.5kW/tonne and 311.39Nm/tonne automatic

Now the Typhoon's already proven to be as fast as, if not faster then the Clubsport.

Add 150kg to the HSV and...

1846kg manual, 1852kg automatic

With 297kW and 530Nm as per VZ...

160.88kW/tonne and 287.10Nm/tonne manual
160.36kW/tonne and 286.17Nm/tonne automatic

It's already around equal to the Typhoon (if not a tad slower). 150kg would give it a massive performance hit. Look at the decrease in torque to weight! And it doesn't have the flat curve of the F6 either. Looks like HSV/Holden have seen the last of their dominance for what looks like it will be a long while.

Even the GT will have a chance to match them now. It'll be LIGHTER, with similar power and torque. How about that.
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1.

:
Steffo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-03-2006, 01:18 AM   #12
GTS_300_Coupe
Mandy Moore FTW!
 
GTS_300_Coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 211
Default

It would've been good if aluminium had become easily accessible by now.
Weight is a car's worst enemy as we all know.
The more weight, the less acceleration, the harder cornering, the more fuel consumption, the greater wear and tear in general. (tyres, transmission, engine)

BMW have been using aluminium shells in their cars for quite some time now and they can easily save 200kgs on weight.
Too bad about the nasty price tags though.
GTS_300_Coupe is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-03-2006, 10:30 AM   #13
danv8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XR8fella
the v6 is a dog with the current weight, slap another 150kg+ on it, will feel like it has less torque than it does now.

but i am looking forward to the VE, healthy competition is always a good thing !

I blame the gearing for the lack luster performance of the V6 the diff ratio really needs to be 3.46 or similar.

The 3.6L V6 in my Rodeo is pretty ballsy thanks to its being a manual and has good gearing. Certainly feels quicker than the Commodore despite having 157kw instead of 170ish and 190 kw.
danv8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-03-2006, 10:48 AM   #14
Homer1
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Homer1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTS_300_Coupe
It would've been good if aluminium had become easily accessible by now.
Weight is a car's worst enemy as we all know.
The more weight, the less acceleration, the harder cornering, the more fuel consumption, the greater wear and tear in general. (tyres, transmission, engine)

BMW have been using aluminium shells in their cars for quite some time now and they can easily save 200kgs on weight.
Too bad about the nasty price tags though.
Well its not about accessibility but rather cost. Ford and Holden can easily deign cars incorporating aluminium body panels but the cost will skyrocket. BMW can afford to do that because they charge more.
Homer1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-03-2006, 11:01 AM   #15
MITCHAY
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 13,363
Default

You get what you pay for. Guys really a Commodore and a Falcon is designed primarily as a family sedan. When you talk about HSV/FPV that's when you should start to worry about weight.

I do realise that they are based on the same platform, but I bet there is a way to make it lighter although the cost would be insane. It depends on how much you're willing to pay for saving weight.

The cost would be (as mentioned previously) INSANE! to make the car lighter, so why would they bother when people are still going to buy them even when they're this heavy.

By the time Ford and Holden catch up to lightweight materials BMW,Porsche and the like would already be using something else. And that's what you would expect as you pay for the privilege.
MITCHAY is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-03-2006, 11:19 AM   #16
McobraR
me may my mo
 
McobraR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hornsby, Sydney
Posts: 627
Default

You guys gotta remember that this is what happened from the change to VS to VT. same engine, with an extra 180kg or so. I think performance was only cut by like less than a second so i dont think it'l be any different in this case. Actually, just thinking about it, it probably wont lose much performance since a 5/6speed auto might be standard and maybe a new diff ratio?
As to what Steffo said about power to weight ratio of a 150kg increase in an HSV, you have to remember that once the VE line of HSVs hits the road, theres gonna be a power increase, so to put it simple, even tho i dont wanna admit it, its probably going to get a little faster, overshadowing the GT and F6.
I reckon in the times ahead, the VE will totally outsell the falcon until the Orion arrives. The current VZ is still outselling the BF, so the VE is just gonna add more salt to the wound
McobraR is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-03-2006, 02:59 PM   #17
Ringo
I see you....
 
Ringo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 989
Default

The 6 speed auto will probably become standard across the range just prior to the VE & Aurion launch. Fuel ecomomy across a fleet is within about 5% in favour of the C'dore but that going to change with the extra weight.

Ford will expand the E-Gas in April 2006 to include Fairmont, XR6 Ute (Auto only) which is a good thing - E-Gas is a real commercial edge for Ford at present as Holden and LPG are so far behind its not funny. E-Gas models are getting better used car prices and have bucked the trend of 6 cyl cars dropping in value.

LPG is all about costs and E-Gas makes a Falcon $100 less per month to lease than ULP versions (roughly) which really gets the attention of big fleet operators and Company Financial Controllers. Holden Dual Fuel actually costs more on lease by about $150 per month (roughly) than a ULP C'dore.

Fleet operators have watched values of used BA's drop $3000 and fuel prices rise by 15% which has them all looking around for cheaper options. 4 cylinder cars are good on paper but mass employee backlash is a real risk (Coke discovered this when they went to Camry and then Corolla from Commodres for their reps - Coke's rep tried as hard as they could to destroy those toyota's with some isolated success) What the Solution ? Tell your employees that they can continue to have a 6 cylinder but it has to be LPG.....

Ford E-Gas production has gone from 5% to 10% of production and it will only grow in 2006. When a E-Gas Territory is going to arrive is anyone's guess but I'd have one. Gas isn't just for BBQ's anymore sunshine !!!

Holdens gaining weight is a wonderful thing.......he he he
Ringo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-03-2006, 03:23 PM   #18
Bucket
XR5 Pilot
 
Bucket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Perth, Ex NSW
Posts: 1,455
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redrum
Will be interesting to see the outcome. I have heard many good things about Orion!!!
: DETAILS! ....(please)
Bucket is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-03-2006, 10:54 PM   #19
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,797
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossxr8
If Ford can make the Orion lighter than the BF then it will Holden a good kick in the nuts. The weight and fuel economy benefits would move Fords way.
Ford US reackons it will use lighter materials by 2010.

Quote:
Originally Posted by McobraR
I reckon in the times ahead, the VE will totally outsell the falcon until the Orion arrives. The current VZ is still outselling the BF, so the VE is just gonna add more salt to the wound
Technically in OZ the BF outsold the VZ in 2005. They get the extra sales due to exports.
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-03-2006, 11:23 PM   #20
ClevlndStemer
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
ClevlndStemer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 703
Default

it could be the EL vs VT all over again.
ClevlndStemer is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-03-2006, 02:40 AM   #21
Steffo
LPG > You
 
Steffo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McobraR
As to what Steffo said about power to weight ratio of a 150kg increase in an HSV, you have to remember that once the VE line of HSVs hits the road, theres gonna be a power increase, so to put it simple, even tho i dont wanna admit it, its probably going to get a little faster, overshadowing the GT and F6.
I reckon in the times ahead, the VE will totally outsell the falcon until the Orion arrives. The current VZ is still outselling the BF, so the VE is just gonna add more salt to the wound
Don't be so sure. HSV do not modify their engines in any way shape or form.

They get the LS2 from America making 400hp 400ftlbs (299kW 542Nm). They put it in the Commodore that's gonna become some sort of HSV, and due to the different exhaust setup in the Commodore to Corvette, it goes down to 398hp 391ftlbs (297kW 530Nm). If the LS2 is only at 400hp in the way they get it, who's to say they will get more? HSV just slots engines into cars. They don't actually DO anything to them.
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1.

:
Steffo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-03-2006, 03:02 AM   #22
Big Mike
Acid Rush XB Coupe
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: a better place than you.
Posts: 2,416
Default

And the engines are slotted into the cars at Elizabeth - not in Melbourne. So tell me, what DO they do at HSV?
Big Mike is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-03-2006, 08:51 AM   #23
Falcon Freak
Banned
 
Falcon Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,516
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vztrt
Technically in OZ the BF outsold the VZ in 2005. They get the extra sales due to exports.
It is not a technicality - it is a fact that the BAII/BF outsold the VZ in 2005.

FF
Falcon Freak is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-03-2006, 09:05 AM   #24
OzJavelin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
OzJavelin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,633
Default

VE heavier than VZ .. now that's a surprise ..

The biggest gripe I have with the VE is that anyone who remotely likes Holdens seems to think that it will be the be-all and end-all of cars .. the greatest thing since sliced bread. I think there will be a LOT of dsappointed people who have been holding off buying a car waiting for this "automotive mesiah" ..

Personally I'd wait until the VE comes out then buy a bargain-basement VZ .. if I was that excited about buying a new Holden.
OzJavelin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-03-2006, 01:03 PM   #25
MeestaNob!
XR5T - Sea Grey.
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 858
Default

Guys, anyone who thinks Orion or any future Falcon will EVER outsell a Commodore is dreaming. Fact is, Ford dont make as many Falcons as Holden do Commodores meaning supply issues. Secondly, the majority of the car buying public judge a vehicles merits by the badge resting in front of the vehicles grill. Everything else (speed, chasis agility, looks, etc) is subjective (ie about as scientific as 'whats your favourite colour').

If the AU had a lion on the front it would have outsold the Ford Commodore 3:1. Its just the way it is.

All we can do as Ford people is enjoy the cars we have, let the Holden guys enjoy the cars they have, and hope Ford stays profitable whilst the rest drive Toyotas.

Holden means a great deal to Australia, buggered if I know why though.
MeestaNob! is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-03-2006, 03:36 PM   #26
JPFS1
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
JPFS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,504
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community. 
Default

Interesting thread....

All i can say is wait for Orion... ;)

VE is so last year already!
JPFS1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-03-2006, 04:08 PM   #27
BENT_8
BLUE OVAL INC.
 
BENT_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,625
Default

I just came back from a holiday on the gold coast where i had a VZ as a hire car. with the missus and three kids in it i found it to be gutless. Infact to get any performance at all i had to wring its neck(sorry avis).
I guess these things must have adaptive autos coz when i cruised slowly around suburbia it wanted to behave as though i was still on the throttle and made harsh changes
I drove my BA to wagga and back and had no trouble passin anything in my way and still got good milage with a cumfy ride too.
BENT_8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-03-2006, 07:07 PM   #28
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vztrt
Ford US reackons it will use lighter materials by 2010.


I'm not talking about using lightweight alloys, I mean by designing weight out of them and by using tailored blanks that put more metal where its needed and less where it isn't. I believe the Territory was the first Australian car to use tailored blanks. I think they were used in the pillars. Smart designing can reduce the overall weight by removing weight from where it isn't needed and by removing items that aren't necessary.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-03-2006, 07:10 PM   #29
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MeestaNob!
Guys, anyone who thinks Orion or any future Falcon will EVER outsell a Commodore is dreaming. Fact is, Ford dont make as many Falcons as Holden do Commodores meaning supply issues. Secondly, the majority of the car buying public judge a vehicles merits by the badge resting in front of the vehicles grill. Everything else (speed, chasis agility, looks, etc) is subjective (ie about as scientific as 'whats your favourite colour').

If the AU had a lion on the front it would have outsold the Ford Commodore 3:1. Its just the way it is.

All we can do as Ford people is enjoy the cars we have, let the Holden guys enjoy the cars they have, and hope Ford stays profitable whilst the rest drive Toyotas.

Holden means a great deal to Australia, buggered if I know why though.
That may have been the case but Ford have been cutting production numbers due to lower demand. Supply caught up with demand more than a year ago. You are correct about the one eyed Holden buyers though, most of the sheep would buy a Commodore no matter how bad it was.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-03-2006, 07:24 PM   #30
Brute6
Lurvin' my Ute!!!
 
Brute6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Geelong
Posts: 1,358
Default

I guess Holden are just realising what it takes to build a decent car...... :
__________________
HIS: FG XR50 Turbo Ute, Sunburst, Sports Bar, Tuned by Herrods! )

HERS: SZ Territory TS, Havana

Proud Member "FPV & XR Owners Club of Vic"

Brute6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 12:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL