|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
27-03-2012, 10:32 PM | #61 | |||
Cynical Idealist
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Posts: 1,512
|
Quote:
In retrospect the Mustang II was the weakest of Mustangs, but it absolutely was not a flop. It debuted about the time of the Arab oil embargo. It sold very well, and the 1974 model was Motor Trend's Car of the Year (more prestigious then than now). The Mustang II was the first Mustang to have rack-and-pinion steering. Its front suspension design remains a very popular conversion for Ford street rods. On the down side, 1974 was the only year Mustang was not available with a V8. Performance was awful for the entire run, but that was true of practically all American cars of the era. The Fox-body Mustang that replaced the Mustang II for the 1979 model year had more interior room, but was lighter than the Mustang II. Still, without the Mustang II, there would be no Mustang today.
__________________
Your plastic pal who's fun to be with! |
|||
27-03-2012, 10:44 PM | #62 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 67
|
Quote:
The comparable Camaros of the day were more appealing IMO. |
|||
28-03-2012, 12:34 AM | #63 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,420
|
Quote:
They were all individual vehicles that drew from common parts but they were never on the same platform..... |
|||
28-03-2012, 01:36 AM | #64 | |||
460 - cubes torque
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Oz
Posts: 134
|
Quote:
|
|||
28-03-2012, 01:50 AM | #65 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,420
|
Quote:
Torino developed from basically the two door Fairlane, there was one short run of similar vehicle called the 70 and a half Falcon but it was just a rebadge of that larger car as the previous Falcon morphed into the Maverick with new front end and flash top hat. Interestingly, FoA chose not to go with maverick,even though it was natural successor to XY Falcon, it couldn't be extended to a Fairlane or LTD as FoA wanted so XA and ZF were developed instead. 1970 1/2 Falcon ( Torino) Ford maverick 4-door Ford maverick 2-door Last edited by jpd80; 28-03-2012 at 01:57 AM. |
|||
28-03-2012, 02:44 AM | #66 | ||
Cynical Idealist
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Posts: 1,512
|
Comet was the Mercury version of the Falcon in the early '60s, and then it was the Mercury version of the Ford Maverick.
The '70-1/2 Falcon was available as a post sedan only (no hardtop version). The Torino debuted for '68 as the top trim level of the Fairlane. For '70 the series was renamed Torino. For '72, when the midsize Ford chassis switched from unibody to body on frame, the top series was the Gran Torino.
__________________
Your plastic pal who's fun to be with! |
||
28-03-2012, 08:45 PM | #67 | |||
Peter Car
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
|
Quote:
Shows that FoA must have seriously looked at selling Maverick here. |
|||
28-03-2012, 11:27 PM | #68 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
|
I was watching the latest episode of Alcatraz tonight, they had a new dark blue standard 5.0 mustang in it ... if they sold it in Australia, I don't think the performance Falcons would have a chance to compete on sales ...
|
||
28-03-2012, 11:36 PM | #69 | |||
Cynical Idealist
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Posts: 1,512
|
Quote:
__________________
Your plastic pal who's fun to be with! |
|||
29-03-2012, 12:39 AM | #70 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 468
|
Quote:
|
|||
29-03-2012, 07:40 AM | #71 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,420
|
Let's not forget th significance of Maverick, FNA used the mustang's front end to revitalise the aging Falcon,
stuck a new top hat on the XR-XY floor plan and voila, new car that sold well and didn't cost much to develop. How about this as an example of One Ford: 1. Joint venture next generation Mustang and Falcon front end/engine bay/Crash protection.\/Firewall section 2. E8 Falcon floor pan from fire wall back - IRS design made in common with Ford global designs 3. slightly wider versions of Mondeo/Fusion top hats onto Falcon, making sedan, hatch and Station wagon possible 4. Top hat stamps and dies shared with Fusion, Mondeo or maybe shared with next gen US Taurus 5. Dash, electrical systems and interior trim/seating all variants of Fusion Mondeo/Taurus. The above achieves the objectives of One Ford making Falcon use existing engineering modules and parts that are already available from global parts suppliers, it's a way for FoA to get funding, keep lcal manufacturing and also channel more work and parts sourcing through Ford's internal chanels, the car may become much more attractive to other regions by being more integrated with parts sourcing and giving that RWd flair needed to ranges. Last edited by jpd80; 29-03-2012 at 07:52 AM. |
||