people with V8's suffer - Page 2

EBFalcs · 10-09-2006, 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kenaz

I don't drive my V8 unless I have to. I usually get a lift or borrow another car from a family member. It's a good way to save on fuel. Although you could also say I'm being pretty tight.

that is tight, do you even put fuel in the borrowed car or do you just driver it and return it, would you do the same thing if you had a 4 cylinder

red_hotxr6 · 10-09-2006, 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EBFalcs

i seen an article in one of the news papers where a lady wrote in saying that all the people in V8's can suffer the fuel price rise cause it's their fault for driving a V8, i did'nt care. but yesterday while driving to work i got stuck behind a laser that was stuck behind a school bus doing 40km/h in a 100km/h zone. which leads into a windy uphill bit of road for a few km/s where the bus does about 25-30km/h which isn't nice to get stuck behind. anyways the laser tried overtaking before the windy bit, and everytime it went to pull out a car came from the other way so it couldn't, eventually there was no cars comeing the other way but the laser knew it couldn't excelerate quick enough to pass the bus before the windy bit, so i'm in my big V8 and i plan't my foot past the laser and the bus and pull in with about 300 meters before the windy bit. so now who's the one who has to suffer because of the size of their engine, the one stuck behind the bus doing 25km/h for a few kays is my answer.

I am not even going to read any further past this thread, the lady was talking about v8,s suffering the fuel prices, well it seems pretty clear to me that you lost big time.You planted your big foot on an all ready thirsty v8 and WILL pay the price for the fuel.The person in the laser is the winner as she was only doing 25ks in her all ready miserly 4cyl car.the next time you are at the pump filling up she will be sailing right past you, and it will be at the speed limit.

MITCHAY · 10-09-2006, 12:56 PM

People with V8s suffer? That's why I bought a Turbo 4 ;). Nearly 500kms to last tank. Overtaking is no problem anymore either. No one holds me up!

70caprigt3k · 10-09-2006, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1970galaxie

28L/100km? You sure about that?
That sucks.

100% Sure, It used to get roughly 160-170km out of a 45L tank

16wantsI6 · 10-09-2006, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by red_hotxr6

I am not even going to read any further past this thread, the lady was talking about v8,s suffering the fuel prices, well it seems pretty clear to me that you lost big time.You planted your big foot on an all ready thirsty v8 and WILL pay the price for the fuel.The person in the laser is the winner as she was only doing 25ks in her all ready miserly 4cyl car.the next time you are at the pump filling up she will be sailing right past you, and it will be at the speed limit.

yeah but atleast in the v8 you'll be at your location on time...
so you wont be to worried bout filling up.

EBFalcs · 10-09-2006, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 16wantsI6

yeah but atleast in the v8 you'll be at your location on time...
so you wont be to worried bout filling up.

exactly,

and as i said the laser tried to overtake several times but couldn't, so it was obviously anxious to get past and get to it's location, but couldn't due to it's gutlessness, so it had to be late unless it did a bit of speeding after the windy road, once it finally had a big enough straight to overtake,

**Professor Farnsworth** · 10-09-2006, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by red_hotxr6

I am not even going to read any further past this thread, the lady was talking about v8,s suffering the fuel prices, well it seems pretty clear to me that you lost big time.You planted your big foot on an all ready thirsty v8 and WILL pay the price for the fuel.The person in the laser is the winner as she was only doing 25ks in her all ready miserly 4cyl car.the next time you are at the pump filling up she will be sailing right past you, and it will be at the speed limit.

pfft you know deep down you want to be red_hotxr8

Genghis · 10-09-2006, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 70caprigt3k

If you baby them, but the catch is with the V8 comes that sweet sweet sound and you just can't help but opening it up a little to get that sound.

MMmmmmm......V8 rumble.

Yes, if you're easy on the pedal you can get quite good milage but the power is on tap if you need it and the accompanying music is just gravy baby!!

red_hotxr6 · 10-09-2006, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 16wantsI6

yeah but atleast in the v8 you'll be at your location on time...
so you wont be to worried bout filling up.

Definitely not disputing that fact, but the topic was about the price of fuel, and the way he passed the laser and the bus just goes to show that he will be at the bowser alot more often than the laser.

**Professor Farnsworth** · 10-09-2006, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by red_hotxr6

Definitely not disputing that fact, but the topic was about the price of fuel, and the way he passed the laser and the bus just goes to show that he will be at the bowser alot more often than the laser.

but that's always up for debate - my corona 2.4i drank the same amount as my EL V8 does - and that was a 4 cylinder. It was a pokey 4 cylinder! Used to get 15l/100km in that.

39ClevoUte · 10-09-2006, 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joes_meat

The V8 will have a smaller amount of load. So it won't use twice as much fuel.
If the 4-pot requires a 30% throttle opening to maintain 100kmph at 2000rpm the V8 will require a 15% load.

The V8 does however, need for fuel to compensate for its higher mass. Quite a lot of your engines power (and consequently fuel consuption) goes into moving all the internal components around and the frictions between surfaces.

If you put a 3-cyl 1 litre DOHC engine from a Daihatsu Charade and put it in your Falcon - it would use more fuel that your V8. Because you would spend the whole time at 100% throttle.

Agree somewhat....The throttle position differences are related to various factors, however as I said: all being equal, at the same revs, the eight and the four must have a minimum fuel air mixture ratio that will be the same, therefore the eight will use twice as much fuel to maintain the same RPM at that A/F Ratio. You can't lean out the eight any more than you can the four.

However, taking into account other factors the four may need to run richer to maintain those revs, this is where the four will loose out. Particularly if you take an extreme example ie towing a heavy load.

In theory the mass augument actually brings the engines into line. The eight could be double the capacity and double the weight, so they are equal.

**Professor Farnsworth** · 10-09-2006, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 54Ghia

Agree somewhat....The throttle position differences are related to various factors, however as I said: all being equal, at the same revs, the eight and the four must have a minimum fuel air mixture ratio that will be the same, therefore the eight will use twice as much fuel to maintain the same RPM at that A/F Ratio. You can't lean out the eight any more than you can the four.

However, taking into account other factors the four may need to run richer to maintain those revs, this is where the four will loose out. Particularly if you take an extreme example ie towing a heavy load.

In theory the mass augument actually brings the engines into line. The eight could be double the capacity and double the weight, so they are equal.

however generally speaking you don't need the same revs in an 8 to match the speed/performance of most 4's.. the 8 will rev lower and have more torque, so once again it's close to even.

39ClevoUte · 10-09-2006, 04:26 PM

Love mine......

**Professor Farnsworth** · 10-09-2006, 04:29 PM

for instance, with the different torque convertor/cam setup in my EB, when you're maintaining a constant 60km/h with two people in the car, it revs at 1100 - 1200rpm!! now that's low. i will attempt to get video of this.

chich · 10-09-2006, 04:40 PM

It really cracks me up how the ones that b*tch and moan about the costs of running a large car are the ones that happily feed coins into poker machines and spend $150 a week on beer and smokes..

xbcool · 10-09-2006, 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EBFalcs

i seen an article in one of the news papers where a lady wrote in saying that all the people in V8's can suffer suffer .

yep I suffer a tightening in the front of my jeans whilst accelerating.

:

RG · 10-09-2006, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xbcool

yep I suffer a tightening in the front of my jeans whilst accelerating.

:

Mmmmmmm V8 rumble, very jeans tightening.

:

SVT8 · 10-09-2006, 05:31 PM

Nothing beats a V8, and as for fuel economy im a p' plater who works for my money and im more than happy to spend it on my car. Although sometimes it does put holes in the pocket a V8 will most likely outlive any 6 cyl engine. So really maintenance does not cost as much as what a 6cyl or even 4cyl car does. I have 2 v8's im my family and one hasnt had a service in 9 years and it still going strong. Our pajero has had 4 major services in the past year, and a couple of hicups along the way.

Im happy to drive a v8 and if people want to complain about v8 drivers and petrol, id say they either have to much times on there hands or they are just simply jealous........

Kenaz · 10-09-2006, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EBFalcs

that is tight, do you even put fuel in the borrowed car or do you just driver it and return it, would you do the same thing if you had a 4 cylinder

Depends who's car it is. If it's my Mum's VS I'll put money in. My Dad has a company car with fuel card so obviously I don't have to give him money. If I had a 4cyl I would probably be less tight about driving my car.

The plan is to maybe get a daily driver of some sort and keep my EL locked in the garage because it's not worth selling.

Falcon Freak · 10-09-2006, 11:17 PM

From my experience V8s are cheap to run. In the three and a half years I have driven my BA XT V8 fuel has cost me $0!

:

FF

EBFalcs · 10-09-2006, 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MITCHAY

People with V8s suffer? That's why I bought a Turbo 4 ;). Nearly 500kms to last tank. Overtaking is no problem anymore either. No one holds me up!

4 cyl turbo's suck the juice just as much as an eight in the same circumstances,

RSgerry · 11-09-2006, 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 70caprigt3k

100% Sure, It used to get roughly 160-170km out of a 45L tank

Yep. I had a Sierra XR4i with a 2.8 fuel injected motor and it used about the same as that around town. Sounded awesome and went like stink, but it drank petrol like nothing else. Now I have a Mini (old style) that uses about 10 litres or less per 100km. And the Mini goes around corners...

70caprigt3k · 11-09-2006, 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RSgerry

Yep. I had a Sierra XR4i with a 2.8 fuel injected motor and it used about the same as that around town. Sounded awesome and went like stink, but it drank petrol like nothing else. Now I have a Mini (old style) that uses about 10 litres or less per 100km. And the Mini goes around corners...

Very nice, the cologne and the Essex V6 sound absolutley phenominal and they go extremely well too. I really miss mine :(

RSgerry · 11-09-2006, 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 70caprigt3k

Very nice, the cologne and the Essex V6 sound absolutley phenominal and they go extremely well too. I really miss mine :(

I always wanted a Mini and bought one after seeing it at a show. Sadly, the Sierra handled like a dog on wet lino and I had too many cars. Mrs made me sell it :-( The fuel consumption was never a huge issue with me as I didnt get to drive it that far anyway. Never mind, the Mini is awesome (nothing on four wheels deals with traffic like a Mini) and the RS is very close in a straight line, but a ton quicker around a track.