|
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-08-2012, 03:25 PM | #29 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 128
|
Quote:
From what many posters here think kerb weight is the only thing that matters. Apparently advising dry has been a waste of time for all these years. Maybe we should go to the state transport authorities and say we want top pay a bit extra for rego because they shouldn't use dry weight to calculate the weight component of our registration fees because kerb weight is all that matters. I do in fact run my car light. I can't imagine why anyone would want to do all their stop start city driving ( which is for most of us the majority of our mileage ) with a full fuel tank. I prefer not to carry and extra 55kgs around unnecessarily so I'm happy to run around with $30 worth of petrol in the tank. Since a full tank of petrol reresents usually about 70% of the fluids I'm actually running much closer to the car's dry wieght than I am to its kerb weight so it can't possibly be insignificant can it ? It is actually more significant that its kerb weight because that's the weight of the car as I drive it around every day. So in fact if I want to drive with economy in mind Kerb weight doesn't matter a jot does it ? The kerb weight is actually a variable while the dry weight isn't. The dry weight actually determines the weight at which I can drive my car around. Regardless of whether the cars are compared at their dry or kerb weights , the point is that even if there's only 140 or 150 kgs in it, that's a lot for two cars of the same size. |
|||