![]() |
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | ||
Mot Adv-NSW
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lake Macquarie, NSW
Posts: 2,153
|
Note: Information.
21 August 2007 The existing 100km/h Tasmanian rural default speed limit is set to be lowered to 90km/h (Asphalt) AND 80km/h (Gravel) for the KINGBOROUGH area - as a 'trial'. I would expect other AUS jurisdictions to follow with time to an advocated 80km/h. I have some concern with having TWO rural defaults, as a road worthy of a speed higher than 80km/h can be so posted easily enough without upsetting the treasury balance!! The reasoning being that old pre 1979 rural speed-zoning practice, typically of 80km/h was indeed 'safer', than was made with later with greater use of both 100km/h signposted, AND the 100km/h rural default adoptions. With a rural default, we really are talking about the worse of the worse. The 100km/h criteria was chosen back then to reduce road user 'concern' at speed derestriction/prima-facie allowance removal. So, to a degree its back to the future, except that the new 'limit' (in this TAS example 'limits') is an absolute, and not prima facie per se! The return to an 80km/h "rural default" for gravel roads and 90km/h for asphalt rural roads, will give greater credibility to existing posted speed-limited lengths of rural road over time, AND can mean higher posted speed limit allowances (than 100-110km/h) for certain high-standard road lengths, or if the jurisdiction decides, speed derestriction on some lengths. In effect, the trade off for higher posted speed limits, OR for speed derestriction, EACH for specific "lengths of road", *must first* see a reduction in the existing rural defaults. My view is that it is appropriate to only have a single rural default speed limit, for cost effectiveness and safety, etc. The 'worse lengths' of default speed-limited rural roads around Australia will be signposted using the "R4-12 : End Speed-Limit" sign. (Not the speed derestriction). The sign signals that the rural default applies, BUT that the road ahead has recognised quality and safety issues. This sign might sometimes carry the additional warning vis; "RURAL ROAD-DRIVE TO CONDITIONS" Use of this sign will be the exception more than the rule. http://www.news.com.au/mercury/story...5-3462,00.html
__________________
ORDER FORD AUSTRALIA PART NO: AM6U7J19G329AA. This is a European-UN/AS3790B Spec safety-warning triangle used to give advanced warning to approaching traffic of a vehicle breakdown, or crash scene (to prevent secondary). Stow in the boot area. See your Ford dealer for this $35.95 safety item & when you buy a new Ford, please insist on it! See Page 83, part 4.4.1 http://www.transport.wa.gov.au/media...eSafePart4.pdf |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |