" The inferior cars our auto industry can’t a-Ford" >

[Chopped]

What a load of tosh !

Check out what this "journalist" has written >

Source > http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/...y-cant-a-Ford/

" Australia’s car manufacturing industry is facing a self-inflicted crisis. After a decade of sliding demand for the locally made Holden Commodore, Ford Falcon and Toyota Camry, car makers have blamed everything but themselves.

But the hard reality is Australian customers are fed up with the half-baked ******** our car industry serves up and refuse to buy an inferior product simply because it’s Australian made.

Massive discounts to woo back disgruntled customers have been too little too late, as recent figures show Australian consumers have made up their minds and prefer superior foreign made cars.

In fact, last year the Japanese made Mazda 3 was crowned Australia’s highest selling car outselling the Commodore for the first time ever, while Falcon sales were down 20 per cent.

But despite the woeful output from local manufacturers, earlier this year the government rewarded the industry with hundreds of millions of dollars - adding to the billions in subsidies already given over the years - with few strings attached.

As Julia Gillard promised the funding would create more jobs, car companies promised to keep producing their mediocre cars in Australia for another few years.

However Ford appears to have had other intentions and yesterday announced another 400 jobs would be lost at two of its plants in Victoria despite a one hundred million dollar government handout earlier this year.

Ford justified the job cuts as necessary as the company continued to overhaul its business operation. Part of the overhaul includes a taxpayer-funded upgrade to the engines in their local car line-up, which will be centred around a “revolutionary” new 2.0L four-cylinder engine in its Falcon for the first time ever, replacing the fuel guzzling, sluggish, six-cylinder engine the Falcon used for nearly 20 years.

But despite the hype, there’s nothing revolutionary about it at all. European and Japanese car companies have been using a similar four cylinder engine for over six years now. Since then they have developed smaller and more efficient engines with more power and lower fuel consumption.

But this typifies Australian car makers’ ethos; they are reactive, rather than pro-active. While foreign car companies find innovative new solutions for their customers, we’re selling inefficient, superseded technology.

Several commentators have made the valid point that a country’s car industry should be its “technical innovation hub”, which would justify the billions of taxpayer investment, but I’m yet to see anything the Australia car industry has developed that would be considered cutting edge innovation.

Australian car manufacturers been pampered by government hand-outs and high import tariffs while producing a boring, uninspiring product that no one actually wants. And judging by the government’s response the cycle looks set to continue.

It might sound obvious, but the only way the car industry is going to reverse its fortunes is to develop a product that people actually want. That’s the idea of running a business, after all.

And with the prospect of over one million cars selling in Australia this year, they’re running out of excuses. "

> The ill informed "media" are out to kill are car industry <

You should read the comments too

[MickyB]

Simply a peanut writing about something that he knows nothing about. The part about the ecoboost engine made me laugh, most reports place it ahead of the low capacity turbo units from MB and Audi. Everyone knows Ford is struggling in Australia, however some of his arguments are laughable.

[pmacc]

Originally Posted by MickyB

Simply a peanut writing about something that he knows nothing about. The part about the ecoboost engine made me laugh, most reports place it ahead of the low capacity turbo units from MB and Audi. Everyone knows Ford is struggling in Australia, however some of his arguments are laughable.

Just some North Shore kid who got spoilt by mummy and daddy while he was growing up. He probably doesnt understand bang for yout buck, let alone anything about the excellent driving dynamics of Australian cars. Let him drive around Manly his Audi A3 and ignore his biased opinion

edit here is an informed opinion
http://www.themotorreport.com.au/546...d-should-it-be

[paule11]

Originally Posted by pmacc

Just some North Shore kid who got spoilt by mummy and daddy while he was growing up. He probably doesnt understand bang for yout buck, let alone anything about the excellent driving dynamics of Australian cars. Let him drive around Manly his Audi A3 and ignore his biased opinion

edit here is an informed opinion
http://www.themotorreport.com.au/546...d-should-it-be

Excellent article

[Buntz]

Originally Posted by pmacc

Just some North Shore kid who got spoilt by mummy and daddy while he was growing up. He probably doesnt understand bang for yout buck, let alone anything about the excellent driving dynamics of Australian cars. Let him drive around Manly his Audi A3 and ignore his biased opinion

edit here is an informed opinion
http://www.themotorreport.com.au/546...d-should-it-be

Ahh good. Someone did post this link. Finally the forum search tool works for me.

This is a great article, and will light the fire of any Falcon enthusiast. Great article right there. If you haven't read it. READ IT!!!

[flappist]

A journalist is a just forum member who gets paid.

Some are trolls. The best way to combat a troll is to ignore them. If no one reacts to what the troll writes his employment is endangered and he will change his position accordingly.

[falconnut]

Originally Posted by flappist

A journalist is a just forum member who gets paid.

Some are trolls. The best way to combat a troll is to ignore them. If no one reacts to what the troll writes his employment is endangered and he will change his position accordingly.

So many times this.

The less attention we give them the more everyone will avoid them.

[mik]

i`d say this statement
" replacing the fuel guzzling, sluggish, six-cylinder engine the Falcon used for nearly 20 years"
he has`nt been in a six cylinder falcon for some years.
another "journalist" trying to make a name for himself.

[2011G6E]

Originally Posted by mik

i`d say this statement
" replacing the fuel guzzling, sluggish, six-cylinder engine the Falcon used for nearly 20 years"
he has`nt been in a six cylinder falcon for some years.
another "journalist" trying to make a name for himself.

Yep...as I've said here before, if we go on a trip somewhere, and don't have to buy anything large or carry a lot of luggage, we used to choose our old 1982 2ltr five speed Celica to save some fuel...however, now we choose the G6E to save fuel, as it uses way less fuel than the Celica on the highway...we usually get about 10ltr to the 100 out of the Celica (normal for a four cylinder of it's time), but the G6E gets down around 7.5 to 8.5 normally...

That said, there are a few "lazy" design points inside the Falcon that could be done way better with a little extra thought...better quality plastics (or maybe a bit thicker), soft close passenger roof grab handles and center console lid, auto up and down on all electric windows, little stuff like that, nothing major, but things that give a car a real and tangible "quality feel".

[KW XRT]

I tend to agree taxpayers {I"ve been working for 34 years** are getting tired of just handing over the dollars first off holden just pulls it's corperate pants down and just shi ts all over the taxpayer buy first crying poor and secondly shelling out millions of dollars to 888 to build V8 Supercar holdens.While an argument could be made that that ford did want them truth is ford could not afford them and the government should have said hang on you can't cry poor and then sign 888 for 10 million.I mean a stroke of the government pen would have saved 10 + million dollars and probably a lot more.Now ford although a bit player in the handout department has grabbed the money and now putting staff off.The reason I agree is I have written to ford on a couple of occasions suggesting they broke ground with the Territory why not look at beating the others by actually building cars that they can make money off.First one a I suggested was a tough as nails 4x4 built right here in Aus like those old Cruisers of yesteryear low on creature comforts and high on toughness.Second was a 4 cyl all wheel drive {4 cyl terry** just a shopping trolly for the Mrs.todate haven't seen anything like this.

[prydey]

Originally Posted by KW XRT

I tend to agree taxpayers {I"ve been working for 34 years** are getting tired of just handing over the dollars first off holden just pulls it's corperate pants down and just shi ts all over the taxpayer buy first crying poor and secondly shelling out millions of dollars to 888 to build V8 Supercar holdens.While an argument could be made that that ford did want them truth is ford could not afford them and the government should have said hang on you can't cry poor and then sign 888 for 10 million.I mean a stroke of the government pen would have saved 10 + million dollars and probably a lot more.Now ford although a bit player in the handout department has grabbed the money and now putting staff off.The reason I agree is I have written to ford on a couple of occasions suggesting they broke ground with the Territory why not look at beating the others by actually building cars that they can make money off.First one a I suggested was a tough as nails 4x4 built right here in Aus like those old Cruisers of yesteryear low on creature comforts and high on toughness.Second was a 4 cyl all wheel drive {4 cyl terry** just a shopping trolly for the Mrs.todate haven't seen anything like this.

Originally Posted by Wretched

The rest well yeah I would kind of agree. As a tax payer I cannot say I am happy with the way the money has been poured into these manufacturers to produce what they have. I know people here consider them world class but until they're sold on the world market I can't agree.

not directed personally at the above 2 posts but these comments about taxpayers money always make me laugh. workers pay tax regardless of whether ford and holden take handouts or not. every worker will still pay tax. the amount is not connected in any way to what the money gets used for. there is no way of dictating what the money gets used for. people who say that they are personally bailing out a company with their tax are funny.

what people also fail to realise is the amount of revenue these industries create for the govt. even with the bailouts, the govt is well in front.


as for the article,

[GT0132]

Originally Posted by prydey

not directed personally at the above 2 posts but these comments about taxpayers money always make me laugh. workers pay tax regardless of whether ford and holden take handouts or not. every worker will still pay tax. the amount is not connected in any way to what the money gets used for. there is no way of dictating what the money gets used for. people who say that they are personally bailing out a company with their tax are funny.

Well they are bailing them out, indirectly...Because the more tax payers money that is used (or should I say wasted) to bail out poorly managed businesses means there is less tax payers money available for essential services like roads, education, health and law and order

[Wretched]

Hmm interesting way of putting it.
I don't disagree with everything in the article though claiming the I6 is a gas guzzling 20 yr old engine is going a little far, its current iteration is a far better engine than it was 20 years ago.

Also whilst our engineering hub hasn't (from Ford) provided any technological innovations it has been a vital player in the APAC region for developing small efficient vehicles and the Ranger.

The rest well yeah I would kind of agree. As a tax payer I cannot say I am happy with the way the money has been poured into these manufacturers to produce what they have. I know people here consider them world class but until they're sold on the world market I can't agree.

[GT0132]

Originally Posted by Wretched

Hmm interesting way of putting it.
I don't disagree with everything in the article though claiming the I6 is a gas guzzling 20 yr old engine is going a little far, its current iteration is a far better engine than it was 20 years ago.

Also whilst our engineering hub hasn't (from Ford) provided any technological innovations it has been a vital player in the APAC region for developing small efficient vehicles and the Ranger.

The rest well yeah I would kind of agree. As a tax payer I cannot say I am happy with the way the money has been poured into these manufacturers to produce what they have. I know people here consider them world class but until they're sold on the world market I can't agree.

Agree too....Everything in that article probably on the money execpt for the 6 cyl engine being thirsty, slugish and 20 years old. The I6 engine of the last decade has been a vastly improved unit.

[Ford_The_Win]

It's the Punch... a favourite of inner-city trendies who have no idea about what the real world is like. I see them all the time on the streets of Carlton, reading The Punch on their iPad. Don't take them seriously.

[PlukaDuck]

Originally Posted by Ford_The_Win

It's the Punch... a favourite of inner-city trendies who have no idea about what the real world is like. I see them all the time on the streets of Carlton, reading The Punch on their iPad. Don't take them seriously.

Not having a shot at the poster here.
That is the real world and the trendies are part of it.

[TMC]

I bet he drives a Kluger.

I reckon he's a loud mouthed moron who hasn't a clue of what he's talking about that couldn't tell a spark plug from an adjustable spanner. Probably has to call the RAC to change a flat tyre. Idiot.

[wrongwaynorris]

Originally Posted by TMC

I bet he drives a Kluger.

I reckon he's a loud mouthed moron who hasn't a clue of what he's talking about that couldn't tell a spark plug from an adjustable spanner. Probably has to call the RAC to change a flat tyre. Idiot.

I reckon the moron would drive a Prius to take Quinton and Titania to day care thence onto his favourite alfresco latte bar for elevensies before going to a tofu bar for lunch actually thinking he is doing the environment a favour .

[cortinagt]

So those of you that agree with the article agree our local cars are inferior in quality?

I emailed The Punch with the following (it could have been better but I only had limited time)

"
Hi,

I have just read your article about the state of Ford manufacturing in Australia. Might want to get you lawyer on the line as Ford would be well within their rights to ask you pro withdraw your poorly researched (or completely off the cuff) story.

You obviously don't know the Ecoboost engine is a brand new cutting edge power plant that Ford Australia developed for it's World debut in a front engine rear wheel drive car. So why the lies?

You say Australian built cars are inferior quality to the rest of the world. When was the last time you drove a 2012 Australian built car? They are at least as good as any car of comparable price and size anywhere in the world.

So why are you writing an article about the failures of the Australian car industry? Perhaps you would be better off looking at your own industry? The dinosaur that is printed media. Online media will not be its saviour. Why because people will not pay to read the tripe you write.

He's a prediction for you. Journalists that write substandard articles with substandard research will not survive. Why? Because the Australian public is*
fed up with the half-baked ******** our journalists serve up and we refuse to buy an inferior product simply because it’s a local report.

So get your lawyer on the line because you could be asked to explain your blatant mistruths. If your wondering if Ford Australia will read your article they will because I will forward it to them.

Ford will be manufacturing in Australian until at least 2016. I don't think an unprofessional journalist will last that long. Do you?

Good luck (you will need it)"

[turbodewd]

Hang on, inferior cars!?

Where on the planet can you buy a large sedan with all the key luxuries that puts down a 0-100 in 5 seconds and delivers 11L/100km?

5 star safety.

Can anyone give me a fact-based argument as to why my car is inferior to car X?

[cortinagt]

I wonder why the same troll journalist wasn't as condemning of poor workmanship in this article

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news...-1226338308277

[KIWI-1]

Originally Posted by cortinagt

I wonder why the same troll journalist wasn't as condemning of poor workmanship in this article

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news...-1226338308277

Who makes the pump?

[TMC]

Here's a message for him from Frank Zappa himself.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQXUCjKd13Q

[madmelon]

Maybe nobody told this moron that Ford Australia actually designed the current model Mazda BT50, amongst various other global cars...

My sister just bought a Mazda 3. Sure it's nice, but it's nothing spectacular. Local interiors are (for the most part) just as good. Do you know why she didn't but a Falcon, Commodore, etc? Too expensive (twice the price on the road!), too physically big and fuel consumption.

[Poetic Justice]

Fair enough LM vehicles aren't doing too well, but how would our production lines be going if Ford produced Focus instead of Falcon and Toyota produced Corolla instead of Camry? Pretend for arguments sake that this wouldn't change the price of the product as it is currently, I think our plants would be working quite well.

So, really, it is unfair to compare the production numbers of a Falcon with the sales numbers of a Mazda 3.

Ford really should have kept going with Focus production locally.

[Resurrection]

Journalists are like real estate agents - no education required to do these jobs.

[Buntz]

Originally Posted by Resurrection

Journalists are like real estate agents - no education required to do these jobs.

"Mitchell lives in Manly, on Sydney’s glorious northern beaches - the real ‘god’s country’ despite what The Shire may think – and now works as a journalist for The Australian newspaper after an unexpected career change from architecture two years ago."

http://www.thepunch.com.au/author-bios/mitchell-nadin/

That really says it all. Used to draw for a living, then started to write articles about Australia's car industry. Next you'll see Kindergartners moving onto Cadetships with The Australian?

Have a look at the about us page: http://www.thepunch.com.au/about-us/

Anyone, and I mean anyone... can write drivel for this site and print it up there. What has the world come to?

[wrongwaynorris]

Originally Posted by Buntz93ED

"Mitchell lives in Manly, on Sydney’s glorious northern beaches - the real ‘god’s country’ despite what The Shire may think – and now works as a journalist for The Australian newspaper after an unexpected career change from architecture two years ago."

http://www.thepunch.com.au/author-bios/mitchell-nadin/

That really says it all. Used to draw for a living, then started to write articles about Australia's car industry. Next you'll see Kindergartners moving onto Cadetships with The Australian?

Have a look at the about us page: http://www.thepunch.com.au/about-us/

Anyone, and I mean anyone... can write drivel for this site and print it up there. What has the world come to?

Get a load of the deers eyes in the headlights look on the gormless yupie ******

[saber]

Originally Posted by Buntz93ED

"Mitchell lives in Manly, on Sydney’s glorious northern beaches - the real ‘god’s country’ despite what The Shire may think – and now works as a journalist for The Australian newspaper after an unexpected career change from architecture two years ago."

Explains everything. Seriously, those who work with architects often (and not all arch’s mind you) will understand some of the ridicules comments/suggestions they make.

One such example:

“Why do we need power cables? Isn’t it done by air now?”

WTF???

[wrongwaynorris]

Originally Posted by saber

Explains everything. Seriously, those who work with architects often (and not all arch’s mind you) will understand some of the ridicules comments/suggestions they make.

One such example:

“Why do we need power cables? Isn’t it done by air now?”

WTF???

I hear ya , and you can also group most electrical engineers and consultants in with those architects .