Quote:
Originally Posted by mitch_lx
ohh look a polo :P at least it wont fall apart :P
|
That joke didn't quite work. Sorry dude.
Plus, it's been fine for a while now!
Torque is more than ample for me. I almost certainly remember EVERYONE saying the Fiesta had ample torque. So, to think the Clio delivers it @ 2,000rpm, not 4,000 should be more than adequate. Plus, you must be the first person to ever be in a 182 and call it 'sluggish'. I was all for a car with low down torque, but yet high end power. Still, achieves great bang for bucks with a 0-100km/h that most cars of $30,000 only dream of.
I dunno how you can say you drive the Polo during the week. Tell them what you REALLY drive
_2: